patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Southbury Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Malloy Proposes Eliminating 25 State Boards and Commissions

The goal of the proposal is to reduce overlap and shrink government, according to a press release from the governor's office.

 

 

Governor Dannel P. Malloy is proposing to eliminate 25 of the state’s 258 boards and commissions to which he can make appointments, to reduce overlap and shrink the size of government, according to a press release from Malloy's office.

The proposal will be included in the legislative package Malloy will introduce for the upcoming 2012 regular session of the General Assembly.

"Over the years when these boards and commissions were first created by statute, most of them served a worthwhile purpose for their time, however many either no longer fit today’s needs, or their functions can be or already are served by another state body that already exists," Malloy said. "It’s incumbent upon us from time-to-time to review and reconsider whether these state boards and commissions are still serving their original purpose, are duplicative, or have completed their tasks."

As an example, Malloy cited the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers National Heritage Corridor Advisory Committee. Both completed the required mission more than 10 years ago, but are still in the statute books, he said.

"The tasks of the Bi-State Farmington River Watershed Advisory Committee are being performed by the Farmington River Coordinating Committee," said Malloy.  "And shorthand reporters are already required to pass a national exam, so there is no longer a need to have a separate overlapping State Board of Examiners of Shorthand Reporters."

Malloy stressed that the proposal is a first step in reviewing existing state boards and commissions. His administration will continue to look into ways to streamline government, including eliminating and merging additional boards and commissions in the future.

The list of boards and commissions Malloy proposes to eliminate includes the following:

  • Adult Literacy Leadership Board
  • Advisory Committee for the Center of Real Estate and Urban Studies (UConn)
  • Advisory Committee for William Benton Museum of Art
  • Bi-State Farmington River Watershed Advisory Committee
  • Board of Directors of the Lower Fairfield County Conference/Exhibit Authority
  • Child Daycare Council
  • Commission on Innovation and Productivity
  • Computer-Assisted Mass Appraisal Systems Advisory Board
  • Connecticut International Trade Council
  • Connecticut Israel Exchange Commission
  • Connecticut Progress Council
  • Connecticut Public Transportation Commission
  • Connecticut Risk Assessment Board
  • Geospatial Systems Information Council
  • HealthFirst Connecticut Authority
  • Housing Advisory Committee
  • Innovations Review Panel
  • Medical Inefficiency Committee
  • Nurturing Families Network Advisory Commission
  • Quinebaug & Shetucket Rivers National Heritage Corridor Advisory Committee
  • Small Business Air Pollution Compliance Advisory Panel
  • Southwest Corridor Action
  • State Board of Examiners of Shorthand Reporters
  • Statewide Community Antenna Television Advisory Council
  • Student Financial Aid Information Council

Malloy is also proposing two mergers, including the Commission on Uniform Legislation into the Connecticut Law Revision Commission, and the Special Contaminated Property Remediation and Insurance Fund Advisory Board into the Brownfield Remediation Liability Workgroup.

Related Topics: Governor Dannel P. Malloy, elimination of Connecticut boards and commissions, and shrinking the size of government

John Symon

2:04 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Headline is the sizzle. Reading the article = no steak.

Bottom line, what's the savings? I bet under $5k. Do some serious cutting, Dan!

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Drazul

12:07 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

If there are bureaucrats on those committees and their jobs are getting cut too then the savings will be a lot more than $5k.

SmallMinds

7:24 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Bottom line: if he cut off his feet you'd still be whining about how he hasn't made any serious cuts. Every mention of his name is another excuse for belly aching. The guy does what you've been screaming at every politician to do - they MUST cut government - and you are complaining.
Bottom line: you hate the guy because he has a (D) after his name and nothing else matters.

Reply

Bob

7:51 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

The problem is, he hasn't done any serious cuts or made unions do his promised concessions. All that has really happened, is that taxes have increased.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg Kuehn

11:46 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Just curious for you to expand on your comment about unions. Do you run a company or something, where your life experience and maybe profits are hurt by the workers you hire demanding a decent living? Not sure why any average working American would ever be against collective bargaining and joining together as workers to demand better wages and benefits.

Paul Improta

12:05 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Shuffling people rather than streamlining is a shell game. As for Kuehn above; Unions have served their purpose in the past, but today they perpetuate mediocrity, limit innovation and actually stagnate wages. Collectively bargaining has evolved into extortion, particularly when you are referring to governmental employees. It legal to add perks, ever-escalating benefits and wages, guaranteed salaries and raises, paid time off to improve education so as to geta bump in class of employee for additional perks and pay, and when you retire, you get a defined benefit plan and medical coverage for life, all at the expense of people who are told so after the smoke-filled room "bargaining" is over, and hey, by the way, your taxes are going up and you have no control over it, because the legislature has mandated it so. That is called extortion in any other quarter.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg Kuehn

12:53 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

To me, you are generalizing. I see your comments as a method which continues to perpetuate negative and outright false statements about unionism. I'm certain if you look at any specific business you will find policies in place that stagnate innovation and promote mediocrity. Unionism itself does not do this. I know this comment area is not really made to have in-depth conversations - there are lots of reasons why, in any industry, stagnation happens. Unions are not the root cause of stagnation. I don't know which unions you refer to, when it comes to salary and benefits compensation. If stagnant wages persist within a union environment, that would only benefit your personal gripe over taxes. However, I have not seen that and would be curious to know where you've seen an instance of that… I see more pressure for "give backs" from unions. Why would anyone who belongs to a union be interested in giving back?

I'm not trying to bust chops - actually would enjoy learning more, if you have that info or are willing to offer. It seems like the gist of your issue is based on taxes, no? Compensation of state employees should impact state taxes… how? Not at all? At what rate? I'm just confused as to knowing how and when a taxpayer (in your opinion) should stand up and say "hey - enough is enough…"

Comment_arrow

Bill Hillman

1:59 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

givebacks for some are should never have gotten in the first place for others. Malloy guaranteed no layoffs for 4 years, wish I could have that kind of guarantee!

David Drazul

12:11 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

How about putting a cap on pensions? I think $100k/year in a pension is too high.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill Hillman

1:56 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

defined benefit needs to sunset in favor of defined contributions, Overtime should not count as pensionable wages, current accuals could be frozen, and an enhanced 401k or 403b enabled

David Drazul

12:15 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Oh, and I approve of Malloy making these cuts. It's a good first step. It boggles my mind that a state the size of CT has 258 state boards, commissions, etc.

Reply

Bob

12:55 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Double dipping after only 20 years seems to be unfair to me. Especially if the pension contains over time which means their pension is based on a higher amount than the actual salary.

Reply

Leave a comment